Vergelijk aanbieders (1)
Winkels met andere maten
Peer review is the main validation mechanism in scholarly publishing. It is held up as an objective process but consists entirely of dynamics between people. The objectivity in peer review is shown to be instead a form of managed subjectivity. “What do we want? Evidence-based science! When do we want it? After peer review!” We have come to think of peer review as the stamp of quality that separates real results from mere conjecture, but a look under the hood reveals that the participants inside of peer review are far from objective. This book reclaims subjectivity and affirms a social mode of objectivity, which prevents peer review from overpromising and underdelivering in its vital role in knowledge production.
Productspecificaties
| EAN |
|
|---|---|
| Maat |
|
Prijshistorie
Prijzen voor het laatst bijgewerkt op: