IMPROVEMENT OF ENGINEERING PROGRAM USING Nsee Standards: NATIONAL SURVEY STUDENT ENGANGAGEMENT (NSEE) STANDARD QUESTIONNAIRE

Name: IMPROVEMENT OF ENGINEERING PROGRAM USING Nsee Standards: NATIONAL SURVEY STUDENT ENGANGAGEMENT (NSEE) STANDARD QUESTIONNAIRE
SKU: 50880c9a371db7442ba0658d6796b247
Price: 68.99 EUR
Availability: InStock

1/1

Afbeelding van IMPROVEMENT OF ENGINEERING PROGRAM USING Nsee Standards: NATIONAL SURVEY STUDENT ENGANGAGEMENT (NSEE) STANDARD QUESTIONNAIRE

Bol

Prijzen vanaf

68,99

Uitgelicht

	68,99	Naar shop
VERGELIJK ALLE AANBIEDERS (1)

Beschrijving

Bol This study assessed the level and drivers of student engagement in the engineering programs of School A using a localized National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive-diagnostic design, data were gathered through a structured online questionnaire administered via Google Forms to all 43 first-, second-, and third-year students enrolled in the Computer, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering programs in Academic Year 2025-2026, and analyzed using frequency distributions, weighted means, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. Results showed that four engagement dimensions-Academic Challenge, Learning with Peers, Campus Environment, and Financial Capability-were rated "High," while Experience with Faculty obtained only a "Moderate" rating (overall mean = 2.45), identifying it as the weakest engagement dimension and primary diagnostic priority.

Lees meer

Vergelijk aanbieders (1)

Sorteren op:

€ 68,99 Gratis verzending

Beschrijving (1)

This study assessed the level and drivers of student engagement in the engineering programs of School A using a localized National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive-diagnostic design, data were gathered through a structured online questionnaire administered via Google Forms to all 43 first-, second-, and third-year students enrolled in the Computer, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering programs in Academic Year 2025-2026, and analyzed using frequency distributions, weighted means, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. Results showed that four engagement dimensions-Academic Challenge, Learning with Peers, Campus Environment, and Financial Capability-were rated "High," while Experience with Faculty obtained only a "Moderate" rating (overall mean = 2.45), identifying it as the weakest engagement dimension and primary diagnostic priority.

Lees meer